Accounting for Sociopolitical Feedbacks to Identify Barriers and Opportunities for Collective Climate Action
Speaker: Dr. Sara Constantino, Stanford & Dr. Elke Weber, Princeton
Date: December 02, 2025
Time: 1:00 PM ET
Location: Virtual
Abstract How individuals and communities perceive and respond to risk is deeply shaped by psychological, social, and cultural forces. While engineering and economics often conceptualize risk in terms of probabilistic outcomes, psychology understands risk as a subjective, affective, and socially mediated experience—one that varies across individuals, groups, and contexts. Recent research shows that various social and psychological factors, such as social identities and social norms, impact how individuals respond to experience of climate risks — and that these responses often depart from objective measures of risk exposure. These same forces also impact how individuals respond to interventions aimed at increasing climate action. This talk examines how risk perceptions change following experience with extreme events, and how social norms shape and constrain collective action on climate change. This research points to potential avenues - as well as potential challenges - for bottom-up changes in climate concern and action that may be especially relevant in a context of limited top-down actions to mitigate the risks associated with climate change.
Biography
Dr. Sara Constantino is an assistant professor at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability in the Department of Environmental Social Sciences and a visiting research scholar at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs. She is also a faculty affiliate at SPARQ and the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute. Her research focuses on understanding the interplay between individual, collective, institutional and ecological factors, including how they shape preferences, decisions, experiences and resilience to extreme events or shocks. Prior to starting at Stanford, she was an assistant professor in the School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs and the Department of Psychology at Northeastern University and an associate research scholar at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs. She received her bachelor’s degree in economics from McGill University, a master’s degree in economics from University College London, a Ph.D. in cognitive and decision sciences from New York University, and did a postdoc focused on environmental policy, politics and decision-making at Princeton University.
Dr. Elke Weber is the Gerhard R. Andlinger Professor in Energy and the Environment and Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs at Princeton University. She is a member of both the German and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. In 2016, she received the Distinguished Achievement Award from the Society for Risk Analysis, in 2023 the Patrick Suppes Prize from the American Philosophical Society, and in 2024 the BBVA Frontiers of Knowledge Award in the Social Sciences.
Resources
-
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
A leading center for understanding public opinion, risk perception, and communication strategies around climate change. -
Ever Higher (James Thurber, 1931)
Thurber’s satirical short piece featuring the 'buckets of water' metaphor—an early literary reflection on perceptions of risk and escalating effort. -
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
A foundational model in finance describing the relationship between expected return and risk; useful as a cross-domain analogy for risk tradeoffs. -
Risk-sensitive foraging: the effect of relative variability
Classic behavioral ecology experiment showing that organisms adapt their choices based on variability, not just mean outcomes—an early model of risk-sensitive decision-making. -
DoSpeRT Scale (Decision-Making Styles and Tools)
Elke Weber’s validated scale measuring risk-taking across domains (ethical, financial, social, recreational, health/safety). Widely used in psychology and behavioral economics. -
A Typology of Risk Preferences
Provides a structured framework for understanding different forms of risk preference beyond simple risk-seeking and risk-averse categories. -
How safe is safe enough? (Fischhoff et al., 1978)
A classic in risk perception research addressing how individuals determine acceptable levels of technological and environmental risk. -
What makes risk acceptable? Revisiting the 1978 psychological dimensions
Reanalyzes Fischhoff’s landmark findings, updating the psychological dimensions that shape acceptance of technological risks. -
Personal hardship narrows the partisan gap in COVID-19 and climate change responses
Shows that direct experience with hardship reduces partisan divides in responses to global crises—a key insight for risk communication and governance. -
"Paying attention and paying the costs: wildfires in the American West"
Analyzes how wildfire risk influences public attention and policy preferences, connecting hazard exposure to political and economic behavior. -
Is Extreme Weather a Catalyst for Climate Consensus?
Examines whether direct exposure to extreme weather events moves populations toward consensus on climate change realities. -
Social interventions for climate mitigation (Mildenberger et al.)
A foundational paper on how behavioral and social interventions can accelerate climate mitigation, relevant to risk communication and collective action. -
Polypolitanism: A Subsidiary Ideal for Democracy (Danielle Allen)
Danielle Allen’s concept of 'polypolitanism,' emphasizing distributed, participatory democratic structures—relevant to governance of complex and systemic risks.